NewsEditorialChampionshipAbout
Motorsportive © 2026
McLaren's Failed Fight Against Las Vegas GP Disqualification
23 November 2025GP BlogBreaking newsRace reportReactions

McLaren's Failed Fight Against Las Vegas GP Disqualification

McLaren drivers Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri were disqualified from the Las Vegas Grand Prix due to excessive plank wear on their MCL39s. Despite McLaren's arguments citing unexpected porpoising and limited practice, the FIA upheld the disqualification, citing no regulatory provision for leniency. This decision significantly tightens the championship, drastically cutting Norris's lead and putting Max Verstappen firmly back in contention.

McLaren drivers Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri were disqualified from the Las Vegas Grand Prix after their cars failed post-race technical inspections, specifically regarding plank wear. Despite McLaren's efforts to argue mitigating circumstances, the FIA upheld the disqualification, significantly tightening the championship battle.

Why it matters:

  • The disqualification of both MCL39s for breaching technical regulations (Article 3.5.9 on minimum skid-block thickness) has major implications for the drivers' championship.
  • Lando Norris's substantial lead over Max Verstappen has shrunk, suddenly re-opening the title fight, a scenario few predicted.
  • This ruling highlights the FIA's strict adherence to technical regulations, even when breaches are deemed unintentional, reinforcing the importance of compliance.

The Details:

  • Regulation Breach: Both McLaren MCL39s were found to have skid-blocks below the minimum 9mm thickness required by Article 3.5.9 of the technical regulations.
  • McLaren's Arguments: McLaren presented several arguments in defense of their drivers:
    • They cited "additional and unexpected porpoising" at the Las Vegas event, suggesting it contributed to the excessive wear.
    • They mentioned limited testing opportunities due to weather on Day 1 and shortened practice sessions, implying insufficient time to detect or rectify potential issues.
    • A final argument suggested "potentially accidental damage that may have led to movement of the floor," which could have caused additional wear.
  • FIA's Stance: The FIA acknowledged McLaren's arguments but maintained that "there was no provision in the regulations or in precedent for any penalty other than the usual penalty" – disqualification.
  • Unintentional Breach: The governing body did stress that it "strongly held the view that the breach was unintentional and that there was not deliberate attempt to circumvent the regulations," though this did not alter the penalty.

The Big Picture:

  • This double disqualification has dramatic consequences for the championship standings.
  • Norris's 49-point lead over Max Verstappen before the race has been significantly reduced, injecting new life into the title race.
  • Max Verstappen, who was trailing, now finds himself only 24 points behind Norris, with Oscar Piastri also level on points with Verstappen, narrowing the gap to his teammate.
  • The incident underscores the razor-thin margins and stringent technical scrutiny in Formula 1, where even minor infractions can lead to severe penalties that reshape championship narratives.

What's next:

  • With the championship battle now wide open, the remaining races will be crucial for Norris to regain momentum and for Verstappen to capitalize on this unexpected turn of events.
  • McLaren will undoubtedly be scrutinizing their car setups and operational procedures to ensure such an incident does not recur, especially as the title fight intensifies.
  • The FIA's firm stance reinforces that teams must maintain full compliance with technical regulations, regardless of external factors or perceived intent.

Comments (0)

Join the discussion...

No comments yet. Be the first to say something!