NewsEditorialChampionshipAbout
Motorsportive © 2026
Russell Criticizes McLaren's Abu Dhabi Team Order Stance
4 December 2025The RaceAnalysisReactionsRumor

Russell Criticizes McLaren's Abu Dhabi Team Order Stance

George Russell has strongly criticized McLaren's potential plan to issue team orders in the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, which could see Oscar Piastri asked to yield to Lando Norris in a bid to secure the title. Russell deemed such a request "not acceptable or reasonable," arguing that both drivers, with their championship hopes, should be allowed to compete fairly to the end. This stance sets the stage for a contentious debate over sporting integrity versus championship ambition at the season's climax.

George Russell has voiced strong disapproval of McLaren's potential use of team orders in the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, calling the idea "not acceptable or reasonable." This comes after reports surfaced that McLaren might ask Oscar Piastri to move aside for Lando Norris if it becomes the only way for Norris to secure the title.

Why it matters:

  • McLaren's stance introduces a significant ethical dilemma at the season's climax, potentially impacting the integrity of the drivers' championship.
  • A team order could alter the outcome of a tightly contested championship, drawing comparisons to controversial historical F1 team maneuvers.
  • The decision will test McLaren's commitment to fair play versus its ambition to secure a championship, a choice that could have lasting implications for team dynamics and public perception.

The Details:

  • McLaren's Evolving Policy: Initially, McLaren resisted favoring either driver despite Max Verstappen's championship threat. However, on the eve of the Abu Dhabi GP, The Race revealed McLaren has opened the door to team orders if it's the sole path for a McLaren driver to win the title.
  • Potential Scenario: A likely scenario for team orders would involve Verstappen leading, with Piastri and Norris running third and fourth. A swap would then ensure Norris wins the championship instead of Verstappen.
  • Drivers' Input: Both Norris and Piastri have stated that these discussions have not yet occurred with them but are expected to happen later in the race weekend.
  • Russell's Argument: Russell believes it's unfair to ask a driver like Piastri, who also has a shot at the championship, to move over. He distinguishes this from scenarios where one driver clearly has no championship chance.
    • He cited historical examples like Checo Perez and Max Verstappen at Red Bull, or Rubens Barrichello and Michael Schumacher at Ferrari, where one driver clearly had no championship shot and moving over was reasonable.
    • Russell asserts that in the current situation, both McLaren drivers should be given a fair shot, and if they lose out, it should be attributed to the better performance of another driver, not a team directive.

Between the lines:

While Norris admitted he "would love" team orders, he stated he wouldn't ask for them, acknowledging it's up to Piastri. Piastri, for his part, remained neutral, stating he couldn't comment until he knew what was expected of him. This internal dynamic highlights the tension between individual ambition and team strategy.

What's next:

  • The upcoming discussions between McLaren and its drivers will be critical in determining their approach to the season finale.
  • The final decision on team orders could significantly influence the championship outcome and set a precedent for future team strategies in tight title fights.
  • All eyes will be on McLaren's actions during the race to see if they prioritize fair competition or championship victory via strategic intervention.

Comments (0)

Join the discussion...

No comments yet. Be the first to say something!