NewsEditorialChampionshipAbout
Motorsportive © 2026
Unexpected Porpoising Led to McLaren's Double DSQ in Las Vegas
27 November 2025The RaceAnalysisRace reportReactions

Unexpected Porpoising Led to McLaren's Double DSQ in Las Vegas

McLaren's double disqualification in Las Vegas was caused by unexpected porpoising, not an aggressive low setup. A cautious, slightly higher rear ride height inadvertently put their cars in a window vulnerable to severe aerodynamic oscillations on the bumpy track, leading to excessive skid block wear and a costly penalty. The incident highlights the complex and often counter-intuitive physics of F1 car performance.

McLaren's double disqualification at the Las Vegas Grand Prix, which saw Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri stripped of their second and fourth-place finishes, was a result of unexpected porpoising caused by the team's cautious set-up choices.

Why it matters:

McLaren's setback in Las Vegas highlights the delicate balance teams must strike between performance and legality in the highly complex world of Formula 1 aerodynamics. This incident underscores how even seemingly conservative decisions can lead to unforeseen consequences, particularly on new or challenging circuits, and can dramatically impact championship standings and team morale.

The Details:

  • DSQ Cause: Both McLaren cars breached F1's rules regarding minimum skid block thickness after the race, indicating excessive wear.
  • Team's Explanation: McLaren attributed the issue to unexpected aerodynamic oscillations (porpoising), which caused the car to ground excessively throughout the race.
  • Unintended Consequence of Cautious Setup: The team emphasized that the cars were not running too low, a typical assumption for plank wear. Instead, their cautious set-up, likely involving a slightly higher rear ride height, inadvertently put the cars in a window vulnerable to porpoising.
  • Porpoising's Resurgence: While porpoising was a major problem in 2022, it has been rare since. However, the high-speed and bumpy nature of the Las Vegas circuit, combined with McLaren's specific setup, triggered severe oscillations that caused significant impacts with the track surface.
  • Counter-Intuitive Outcome: Had McLaren adopted a more aggressive, lower ride height, the porpoising phenomenon might not have been triggered, potentially leading to less plank wear. Lando Norris suggested they “didn't take enough risk,” implying a lower setup could have been safer in this specific scenario.
  • Ineffective Mitigation: The team's attempt to mitigate the issue by 'lifting and coasting' in high-speed sections was not effective and, in some instances, even exacerbated the problem. This further suggests that the higher rear ride height was a confounding factor, as the rear would run even higher when off-throttle.

The Big Picture:

This incident reveals the intricate and often unpredictable physics at play in modern F1 cars. Teams constantly push the limits of design and setup, and even small variables can have significant, unexpected impacts. McLaren's situation in Las Vegas serves as a stark reminder that optimizing for one aspect (like cautious ride height) can unintentionally create problems in another (like porpoising and excessive plank wear).

What's next:

McLaren will undoubtedly analyze the data meticulously from Las Vegas to prevent a recurrence, especially as they head into upcoming races. This complex issue highlights that even for top teams, understanding every variable on new circuits under race conditions remains an ongoing challenge. The team will continue to push development, but with a renewed understanding of how seemingly minor setup changes can lead to major consequences.

Comments (0)

Join the discussion...

No comments yet. Be the first to say something!