NewsEditorialChampionshipAbout
Motorsportive © 2026
F1 Stewards Accused of 'Too Rigid' Rules Enforcement After Piastri Penalty
14 November 2025Racingnews365AnalysisCommentaryRace report

F1 Stewards Accused of 'Too Rigid' Rules Enforcement After Piastri Penalty

F1 stewards in Brazil faced criticism for their "too rigid" application of rules after penalizing Oscar Piastri for a clash with Kimi Antonelli and Charles Leclerc. Former driver Jolyon Palmer defended Piastri, arguing that once committed to a corner, drivers can't simply disappear, and that the penalty didn't account for the realities of high-speed racing dynamics. The incident reignites debate over stewarding consistency and the balance between strict rules and promoting aggressive, wheel-to-wheel racing.

Former F1 driver Jolyon Palmer has criticized the stewards' decision-making at the São Paulo Grand Prix, suggesting they applied rules "too rigidly" in penalizing Oscar Piastri for a collision involving Kimi Antonelli and Charles Leclerc.

Why it matters:

Consistency and fairness in stewarding are crucial for the integrity of Formula 1. When decisions are perceived as overly rigid and not reflective of racing realities, it can spark debate among drivers, teams, and fans, potentially influencing future on-track battles and how drivers approach tight racing situations.

The details:

  • The Incident: During the early stages of the São Paulo Grand Prix, McLaren driver Oscar Piastri was involved in a three-way clash with Kimi Antonelli and Charles Leclerc.
  • Stewards' Verdict: Piastri was deemed at fault for the incident that led to Leclerc's retirement from the race. He received a 10-second time penalty, which was served during a pit stop.
  • Piastri's Defense: After the race, Piastri defended his actions, stating that a driver on the inside cannot simply "disappear" once committed to a corner.
  • Palmer's Support: Jolyon Palmer, in his F1 column, echoed Piastri's sentiments, arguing that drivers are committed to their line once braking and cannot easily alter their trajectory without causing a lock-up.
    • He noted that trying to brake harder or steer more drastically would likely lead to a front lock-up, which is precisely what happened to Piastri as he attempted to avoid the collision.
  • Critique of Stewarding: Palmer believes the racing guidelines were followed "too rigidly," advocating for stewards to allow drivers more space for wheel-to-wheel racing rather than penalizing for committed apex decisions.

The big picture:

This incident highlights the ongoing tension between strict rule enforcement and the dynamic nature of F1 racing. While safety and fair play are paramount, former drivers like Palmer often bring a practical perspective on what's physically possible for a driver in the heat of a race. This debate often resurfaces whenever close racing incidents result in penalties, questioning whether the rules truly accommodate the nuances of high-speed, close-quarters combat.

What's next:

While Piastri ultimately finished fifth in the race, and his teammate Lando Norris secured a victory to boost his championship chances, the discussion around this penalty will likely continue. Such debates often influence future steward briefings and may subtly shift how incidents are reviewed, aiming for a balance between upholding rules and promoting exciting, aggressive racing.

Comments (0)

Join the discussion...

No comments yet. Be the first to say something!