NewsEditorialChampionshipAbout
Motorsportive © 2026
Piastri Reacts to Brazil GP Penalty: 'Not Sure Where I'm Supposed to Go'
9 November 2025GP BlogRace reportReactions

Piastri Reacts to Brazil GP Penalty: 'Not Sure Where I'm Supposed to Go'

Oscar Piastri expressed frustration and confusion over his penalty at the Brazilian Grand Prix, where a collision with Andrea Kimi Antonelli led to Charles Leclerc's retirement. Piastri maintained he had a clear overtaking opportunity and was in full control, arguing he couldn't have gone further left. He questioned the stewards' decision, highlighting the complexities of racing incidents on damp tracks.

Oscar Piastri expressed bewilderment regarding his penalty at the Brazilian Grand Prix, where a multi-car crash with Andrea Kimi Antonelli and Charles Leclerc led to Leclerc's retirement. Despite a smokey lock-up, Piastri maintained he was in full control and couldn't have gone further left, stating he had a "very clear opportunity" on the inside.

Why it matters:

Piastri's incident, and his subsequent reaction, highlight the fine margins and often contentious interpretations of racing incidents in Formula 1. This particular crash led to a DNF for Charles Leclerc, impacting the constructors' standings and reigniting debates about racing etiquette, especially on damp tracks and restarts.

The Details:

  • The incident occurred at Turn 1 shortly after a green flag restart, following earlier debris from another crash.
  • Piastri attempted an overtake on the inside of Andrea Kimi Antonelli, with Charles Leclerc on the outside.
  • Contact between Piastri and Antonelli ensued, which then collected Leclerc, forcing the Ferrari driver to retire.
  • Piastri admitted to a lock-up but asserted he was "firmly on the apex, on the white line" and "couldn't go any further left." He felt he was in control of his car despite the lock-up.
  • He also suggested that a lack of space left by Antonelli on the inside contributed to the collision.
  • When informed he was reportedly losing ground at the braking point, Piastri countered that he was being cautious due to damp track conditions on the inside, implying his competitors might have braked later.
  • Piastri stated that if he had clearly understeered and missed the apex, he would understand the penalty, but given he was "as far left as I could have gone," he found the decision difficult to comprehend.

The Big Picture:

This incident adds to the growing discussion about aggressive driving and steward decisions in F1. With sprint races and frequent restarts, drivers are often pushed to the limit, leading to more on-track drama but also increased scrutiny. Piastri's perspective underscores the complexity of split-second decisions and the varying viewpoints on who is at fault in racing incidents.

What's Next:

While the immediate fallout is a penalty for Piastri, the long-term impact could influence how drivers approach similar situations, particularly during restarts and on tricky track conditions. The incident will likely be reviewed in team debriefs, potentially leading to strategy adjustments for future races. These kinds of calls often shape driver reputations and contribute to the ongoing narrative of competitive driving in F1.

Comments (0)

Join the discussion...

No comments yet. Be the first to say something!